Which consequence may occur when using Native SQL in ABAP programs?

Using Native SQL in ABAP programs leads to the consequence of loss of database independence. This is primarily because Native SQL allows developers to execute database-specific SQL statements directly, which are tailored to the underlying database system in use, such as SAP HANA, Oracle, or MS SQL Server. As a result, the program's code becomes tightly coupled with that specific database system, making it difficult to switch to a different database without significant modifications to the SQL statements.

In contrast, Open SQL, which is the more typical method used in ABAP, maintains database independence by allowing developers to write SQL statements in a way that is agnostic of the underlying database. This means the same ABAP code can run on different database systems without changes, which enhances portability and flexibility.

Therefore, while Native SQL may offer specific advantages in certain scenarios, such as leveraging advanced features of the database or optimizing specific queries, it does so at the cost of maintaining the portability and independence of the code across various database platforms.